Table 3.
December 2005a |
January 2006
|
October 2006
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOC
|
SDA
|
TOC
|
SDA
|
TOC
|
SDA
|
||||||
BD | BD | MD | BD | MD | BD | MD | BD | MD | BD | MD | |
N1 | − | +++ | +++ | +++ | nd | +(42) | nd | − | nd | ++b | nd |
N2
|
−
|
+++
|
nd
|
+
|
−
|
+++
|
nd
|
−
|
nd
|
+++
|
nd
|
S1 | +++ | +++ | nd | ++(48) | nd | +++ | nd | ++(36) | +++ | +++ | +++ |
S2 | −
|
+++
|
nd
|
+++
|
nd
|
+++ | +++ | ++(36)
|
+++
|
+++
|
+++
|
S3 | +++ | +++ |
Results for a 30 days period and day of degradation, if occurred within 60 days after sampling, as numbers in brackets.
complete degradation (> 90%)
degradation (50 to 90%)
little degradation (10 to 50%)
no degradation (< 10%)
not detected
North port samples 1, 2
South port samples 1, 2, 3
No metabolites detected in TOC method
Experiment stopped on day 30