Pros
|
Large quantities of homogeneous cells economically generated
|
Large quantities of primary cells are readily obtained; cells differentiated in presence of CNS astrocytes and oligodendrocytes
|
Differentiated in the presence of intact, functional CNS
|
Retention of three-dimensional orientation of differentiated CNS neurons, microglia and microglia, easy delivery of cells and molecules
|
Intact CNS environment
|
Intact CNS environment, separate manipulation of CNS-resident microglia and peripheral immune cells
|
Cons
|
Polarized phenotypes, different lines might yield different assays
|
Differentiated in the absence of functional neurons, hyperresponsive to pathogenic stimuli
|
Difficult to obtain sufficient numbers of cells for many assays
|
Slice ‘wound’ introduces ill-defined inflammatory stimuli to culture system
|
Incomplete deletion/depletion of only subsets of microglia; difficult to directly measure microglial function
|
Chimeric mouse methodologies alters vasculature and circulating immune system, difficult to directly measure microglial function
|
Best use of model
|
High throughput and first screen assays
|
Signal transduction assays, molecular manipulation of gene expression and functional consequences of mutational
|
Assays requiring purified microglia, final assays confirming key observations made in high throughput
|
Controlled manipulations and measurements difficult to perform in the intact animal (addition of exogenous cells, compounds)
|
Test of function within intact CNS and in presence of interacting endocrine and immune systems
|
Test of function within intact CNS and in presence of interacting endocrine and immune systems
|
How to get access
|
ATCC
|
Prepare from fetal or neonatal CNS tissue
|
Prepare from adult CNS tissue
|
Prepare from intact CNS
|
Various animal vendors and research groups
|
Generate from rodent strains on hand
|
Refs
|
[16-18] |
[7,8] |
[5-7] |
[14,15] |
[21,22,26-28] |
[23-25], Reviewed in [9] |