TABLE 2.
Subject | RIG1 | RIG4 | SR | SI | SRI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.83†* | 0.61†* |
S2 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.97† | 0.93 | 0.94 |
S3 | 0.32 | 0.90 | 0.44* | 0.17* | 0.61* |
S4 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.91* | 0.94 | 0.56†* |
S5 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.98* | 0.96* |
S6 | 0.38 | 0.90 | 0.91† | 0.81 | 0.64* |
Median R2 values are shown for each subject from regression of FZ onto FY during the load phase. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to compare the R2 distributions between rigid and nonrigid conditions. Significantly different
(P < 0.05) from RIG1 or
RIG4.