TABLE 3.

Incidence and percent recovery of T1 X. euvesicatoria strain E3-1 isolates from lesions on tomato plants that received various treatments in three field experiments^a

Treatment	AUIPC,a % recoveryb
	2004, Citra	2005
		Citra	Quincy
Uninoculated control	0 (c),c 0	427 (b), 13	157 (b), 7
Growers’ standardd	563.8 (a), 21	1,271 (a), 37	757 (ab), 15
T1 (E3-1) alone	614.5 (a), 26	1,614 (a), 54	1,430 (a), 30
91-118::ΔopgHΔbcnB alone	0 (c), 0	238 (b), 5	92 (b), 2
91-118::ΔopgHΔbcnB (2) + T1e	181.0 (b), 5	469 (b), 12	890 (ab) 25
91-118::ΔopgHΔbcnB (1) + T1f	158.2 (b), 4	333 (b), 8	477 (b), 11

^aAUIPC values are from fields evaluating E3-1 populations for each season for each treatment.

^bPercent recovery is the average percent recovery of E3-1 populations for the season for each treatment.

^cValues followed by the same letter are not significantly different based on the Waller-Duncan multiple-range test (P = 0.05).

^dGrowers’ standard plots were treated with copper hydroxide plus mancozeb and acibenzolar-S-methyl every 2 weeks throughout the season.

^eThe 91-118ΔopgHΔbcnB (2) + T1 plots were treated with the 91-118::ΔopgHΔbcnB strain every 2 weeks throughout the season.

^fThe 91-118ΔopgHΔbcnB (1) + T1 plots were treated with the 91-118::ΔopgHΔbcnB strain weekly throughout the season.