Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 26;1(3-4):205–211. doi: 10.1007/s12178-008-9033-4

Table 1.

Review of studies

Method Recurrence rate (%) Follow-up
Aspiration
     1. Nield and Evans 59 1 year
     2. Varley 67 (no improvement with multiple aspirations) 4 months
     3. Zubowicz 15 (multiple aspirations) 1 year
     4. Stephen et al. 69
     5. Dias and Buch 47 2 and 5 years
     6. Westbrook 49 6 weeks
Average 51
Aspiration and steroid
     1. Derbyshire 14 2 months–5 years
     2. Paul and Sochart 51
     3. Wright et al. 83 (even with repeat aspirations)
     4. Breidahl and Adler 60
Average 52
Aspiration with hyaluronidase
     1. Otu 5 6 months
     2. Paul and Sochart 51 2 years
     3. Nelson 43 1–8 years
     4. Jagert 77 1 year
Average 44
Aspiration and sclerosant
     1. McEvedy 18 13 years
     2. Mackie 93 3 months
Average 55
Aspiration with splinting
     1. Korman et al. 48 (same as nonimmobilized) 1 year
     2. Richman et al. 60 (better than nonimmobilized control) 22 months
Average 54
Aspiration with multiple puncture
     1. Stephen et al. 78
     2. Richman et al. 64 22 months
     3. Korman et al. 49 12 months
Average 64