Skip to main content
. 2009 May;7(3):212–222. doi: 10.1370/afm.942

Table 3.

Initial Entry Round (Year 1) Through Last Entry Round (Year 4) of Screening: False-Positive and Resulting Diagnostic Follow-Up Rates

Physician Response
Repeated Screening Imaging Minimally Invasive Procedurea Moderately Invasive Procedureb Major Surgical Procedurec
Subgroup Ever False Positive No. (%) No. (%)d % of FPse No. (%)d % of FPse No. (%)d % of FPse No. (%)d % of FPse No. (%)d % of FPse
Overall rates 29,517 (43.1) 13,576 (19.8) 46.0 7,306 (10.7) 24.8 2,049 (3.0) 6.9 10,822 (15.8) 36.7 1,062 (1.6) 3.6
    Men 17,432 (50.9) 9,251 (27.0) 53.1 4,056 (11.9) 23.3 1,088 (3.2) 6.2 6,972 (20.4) 40.0 47 (0.1) 0.3
    Women 12,085 (35.3) 4,325 (12.6) 35.8 3,250 (9.5) 26.9 961 (2.8) 8.0 3,850 (11.3) 31.9 1,015 (3.0) 8.4
By screening modality: menf
    PSA 3,388 (10.4) 2,884 (8.9) 85.1 1,494 (4.6) 44.1 1 (0.0) 0.0 1,491 (4.6) 44.0 6 (0.0) 0.2
    DRE 4,882 (15.0) 3,881 (12.0) 79.5 1,326 (4.1) 27.2 0 (0.0) 0.0 1,259 (3.9) 25.8 1 (0.0) 0.0
    CXR 6,320 (18.6) 3,216 (9.5) 50.9 1,466 (4.3) 23.2 52 (0.2) 0.8 77 (0.2) 1.2 35 (0.1) 0.6
    FSG 8,186 (26.8) 645 (2.1) 7.9 157 (0.5) 1.9 1,036 (3.4) 12.7 4,821 (15.8) 58.9 5 (0.0) 0.1
By screening modality: womenf
    CA-125 888 (3.0) 567 (1.9) 63.9 349 (1.2) 39.3 0 (0.0) 0.0 103 (0.4) 11.6 125 (0.4) 14.1
    TVU 2,310 (7.8) 745 (2.5) 32.3 1,394 (4.7) 60.4 1 (0.0) 0.0 677 (2.3) 29.3 874 (3.0) 37.8
    CXR 5,531 (16.3) 2,907 (8.6) 52.6 1,498 (4.4) 27.1 56 (0.2) 1.0 93 (0.3) 1.7 40 (0.1) 0.7
    FSG 5,239 (17.2) 321 (1.1) 6.1 151 (0.5) 2.9 906 (3.0) 17.3 3,072 (10.1) 58.6 7 (0.0) 0.1

CA-125 = cancer antigen 125; CXR = chest radiograph; DRE = digital rectal examination; FP = false positive; FSG = flexible sigmoidoscopy; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; TVU=transvaginal ultrasonography.

Note: These percentages reflect only the subset of diagnostic procedures directly caused by a false-positive result; they do not include procedures associated with a true-positive or negative.

a Example: simple endoscopy with conscious sedation (see Table 1 for the complete list of procedure classifications).

b Example: tissue removal, more involved instrumentation, or general anesthesia, including laparoscopy.

c Example: prostatectomy, or laparotomy with colectomy or oophorectomy.

d Percentage among participants in the intervention arm that took at least 1 screening examination.

e Percentage among participants in the intervention arm that received at least 1 false-positive examination (change in denominator). This percentage (and the accompanying crude numbers) does not include procedures that resulted in a true positive (diagnosis of cancer).

f In each case, the denominator is the total number of participants taking examinations for a given screening modality; this number varied depending on differences in compliance with different tests.