Skip to main content
. 2009 May 26;180(11):E72–E81. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081316

Table 5.

Use of emergency department services by study patients, by location and type of physician group

All locations
Major urban centres
Non-major urban centres
Rural centres
Variable Enhanced fee-for-service Capitation Enhanced fee-for-service Capitation Enhanced fee-for-service Capitation Enhanced fee-for-service Capitation
No. of visits, mean (SD) 0.4 (1.2) 0.5 (1.3) 0.3 (1.1) 0.3 (0.9) 0.6 (1.4) 0.6 (1.3) 0.9 (2.0) 1.0 (1.9)
Ratio of semiurgent or nonurgent visits to urgent visits* 0.9 1.6 0.6 0.7 1.5 1.6 2.6 4.8
Ratio of after-hours to regular-hour visits 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
% of patients who visited emergency department during past 6 months 23.2 27.7 20.3 20.6 30.6 30.3 39.2 43.3
No. of visits in 2005/06, mean (SD) 0.48 (1.07) 0.49 (1.21) 0.31 (0.94) 0.32 (0.89) 0.54 (1.25) 0.52 (1.18) 0.80 (1.84) 0.93 (1.82)
No. of visits in 2003/04, mean (SD) 0.37 (1.05) 0.48 (1.21) 0.30 (0.90) 0.32 (0.88) 0.54 (1.31) 0.52 (1.24) 0.84 (1.80) 0.90 (1.79)

Note: SD = standard deviation.

*

Semiurgent and nonurgent visits were those rated as 4 and 5 on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale; urgent visits were those rated as 1, 2 or 3 on the scale.19

Visits during regular hours were those on weekdays from 9 am to 5 pm.

From October 2005 to March 2006.