Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2009 Feb 3;136(2):99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.01.016

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Static model. (A) HE image of a soleus axial cross-section showing the isotropic and homogeneous porous architecture and uniform interstitial spacing under 0% and 20% strains. A myofiber is outlined. (B) Two dimensional depiction of the homogeneous muscle axial cross-section with myofibers idealized by a regularly repeating lattice of staggered diamonds (white) interspaced with interstitial channels (pink) of consistent width. Symmetry of the problem allowed the computation to be carried out on a reduced domain, Ω, formed by a single lattice arrangement of diamonds (inset) with (C) boundaries Γ1 and Γ2. (D) HE image of the inhomogeneous fiber arrangement with wide interstitial channels (green) separating fascicles (black) of myofibers that occur under 5%, 10%, and 15% strains. (E) Depiction of the inhomogeneous muscle cross-section with a wide interstitial channel added to the regular lattice. Location of the channel with respect to the diamonds did not significantly influence transport.