Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;174(6):2044–2050. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080776

Table 2.

Comparison of IHC Scores between SND1 and AMACR Stratified by Final Diagnosis, PSA, Gleason score, and Pathological Stage for 62 Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

IHC score SND1
AMACR
0 1 2 3 Mean P* 0 1 2 3 Mean P*
No. cancer total 2 14 40 6 1.8 <0.0001 0 6 25 31 2.4 <0.0001
No. PSA (ng/ml) 0.012 0.85
 <10 0 9 10 1 1.6 0 2 9 9 2.4
 10<20 2 5 20 1 1.7 0 2 9 9 2.4
 >20 0 0 9 3 2.3 0 0 6 6 2.5
No. Gleason score 0.025 0.65
 2<6 1 7 9 0 1.5 0 2 8 7 2.3
 7 1 4 23 2 1.9 0 4 10 16 2.4
 8<10 0 3 8 4 2.1 0 0 7 8 2.5
No. pathological stage 0.95 0.60
 pT2 1 8 25 4 1.8 0 4 16 18 2.4
 pT3 1 5 16 2 1.8 0 2 9 13 2.5
 No. HGPIN 7 31 4 0 0.93 4 33 5 0 1.0
 No. hyperplasia 37 14 0 0 0.24 27 24 0 0 0.47
 No. normal gland 47 15 0 0 0.27 34 28 0 0 0.45
*

P value for differences mean score among groups of cancer, HGPIN, hyperplasia and normal gland, and each group of PSA. Gleason scores were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. P value for difference between pT2 and pT3 was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test.