Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;174(6):2347–2356. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081037

Table 3.

Univariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors for DSS in the Gynecological and Nongynecological LMS

Factors Gynecological LMS (76)
P Nongynecological LMS (73)
P
5DSS Rate % (number of cases) 5DSS Rate % (number of cases)
Age
 <50 53 (36) NS (0.8) 61 (29) NS (0.8)
 ≥50 56 (40) 64 (44)
Tumor size
 ≤10 cm 71 (44) 0.03 73 (45) 0.02
 >10 cm 33 (25) 44 (24)
Histological grade*
 1 37 (20) NS (0.9) 83 (19) NS (0.15)
 2 62 (38) 66 (34)
 3 59 (18) 40 (12)
Mitotic index
 1 62 (23) 0.003 82 (24) NS (0.3)
 2 95 (21) 63 (24)
 3 33 (32) 53 (17)
Necrosis
 0 53 (45) NS (0.7) 68 (43) NS (0.7)
 1 55 (26) 55 (16)
 2 66 (5) 75 (6)
CSF1 signature
Positive 0 (14) 6 × 10−5 53 (28) 0.03
Negative 58 (50) 74 (35)
*

FNCLCC grading system was used to classify nongynecological LMS. We classified the gynecological LMS based on cellular differentiation. 

LMS that co-expressed all four markers (CSF1, CTSL1, FCGR3a, and CD163) were considered CSF1 signature-positive. LMS that failed to express at least one or more of the four markers were called CSF1 signature-negative. 

5DSS, 5-year disease-specific survival rate in percentage (number of cases); NS, not statistically significant.