Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Women Health. 2008;48(4):429–444. doi: 10.1080/03630240802575179

Table 3.

Relation of Sexual Orientation to Eating, Activity, Sleep and Health. Means and standard errors (in parentheses) and the degrees of freedom for the F-ratios are provided.

Variable Lesbian Heterosexual Abstention F P
1 Amount of Food 1.82 (.05) 1.93 (.03) 1.92 (.04) 2.02 (2,174) .14
2 Breakfast .67A (.04) .73 (.02) .81 (.03) 4.18 (2,174) .02*
2 Lunch .88 (.02) .88 (.01) .90 (.02) .67 (2,174) .51
2 Dinner .94 (.01) .93 (.01) .94 (.02) .22 (2,174) .80
3 # of Cravings .63 (.06) .50 (.04) .50 (.05) 1.95 (2,174) .15
2 Cravings for sweet/chocolate .34 (.04) .26 (.02) .27 (.03) 1.76 (2,174) .18
2 Satisfy sweet/chocolate .83 (.06) .74 (.04) .68 (.05) 2.13 (2,174) .12
Alcohol see Table 4 .50 (.07) .40 (.05) .50 (.06) 1.16 (2,174) .32
3 Spices .96 (.11) .92 (.07) .76 (.08) 1.39 (2,174) .25
1 Nuts/Tofu .49 (.06) .45 (.04) .39 (.05) .82 (2,174) .44
Pedometer (# of steps) 6772 (496.64) 7912 (329.01) 8109 (400.19) 2.40 (2,167) .09
2 Exercise .29H (.04) .42 (.03) .35 (.03) 3.07 (2,174) .05*
Minutes of Sleep 475 (8.39) 480 (5.42) 464 (6.60) 1.80 (2,174) .17
1 Quality of Sleep 2.03 (.05) 1.94 (.03) 1.98 (.04) .91 (2,174) .40
3 Health .49 (.07) .47 (.05) .41 (.06) .50 (2,174) .61
IgA (log amount) 1.33A (.05) 1.38A (.03) 1.5 (.04) 4.46 (2,159) .01*
Cortisol (amount) .07A (.03) .12 A (.02) .19 (.02) 4.34 (2,134) .02*

A,H and L indicate that the superscripted group significantly differed from the abstinent, heterosexual or lesbian group, respectively, in post-hoc analyses.

1

Variable had 3 levels (1 = less than usual, 2 = about the same as usual, 3 = more than usual) and nuts/tofu has 3 levels (0=none consumed, 1 = nuts or tofu consumed, 3 = both nuts and tofu consumed)

2

Variable had two levels (0=absence, 1=presence)

3

# of cravings and spices (range 0 to 5); Health symptoms (range 0 to 4)

*

with more conservative tests this effect would not reach statistical significance