Skip to main content
. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005588

Table 3. Risk of lung cancer-specific death in proband's relative (child, sibling, spouse) depending on proband survival.

Pairs of relatives Survival in probanda Number of relatives to proband Number of deaths in relative to proband Risk of lung cancer related death in proband's relative
Adjusteda Trend test Adjustedc Trend test
HR (95% CI) p valuesb HR (95% CI) p valuesb
Parentd-Childe 0.05 0.04
Good 109 67 0.73 (0.52–1.00) 0.71 (0.51–0.99)
Expected 221 157 0.87 (0.68–1.16) 0.86 (0.65–1.13)
Poor 109 83 1.0 ref. 1.0 ref.
Sibling-Siblinge 0.02 0.05
Good 15 4 0.24 (0.072–0.81) 0.14 (0.030–0.65)
Expected 32 25 1.42 (0.66–3.05) 1.26 (0.48–3.27)
Poor 16 10 1.0 ref. 1.0 ref.
Spouse-Spoused 0.32 0.26
Good 131 97 0.87 (0.66–1.15) 0.85 (0.64–1.13)
Expected 262 196 0.91 (0.71–1.15) 0.90 (0.70–1.15)
Poor 132 102 1.0 ref. 1.0 ref.
a

Multivariate proportional hazard (Cox) model adjusted for calendar year of diagnosis and age at diagnosis.

b

One degree of freedom.

c

Multivariate proportional hazard (Cox) model adjusted for calendar year, age and place of diagnosis, socioeconomic status, tumour histology and gender.

d

Parents (Spouses) diagnosed between January 1961 and December 2001.

e

Children (siblings) diagnosed between January 1991 and December 2001.