Table 2.

Differential Cue Reactivity (controlling for response to neutral cues) as Predictors of Smoking Behavior ^a

	B	Std. Error	95% CI for B	β	p
Subjective Cue Reactivity
Smoking on Day of Cue Reactivity Assessment
In Vivo Smoking Cue 1
QSU	.6	1.1	−1.6 – 2.8	.1	.6
QSU Factor 1	.8	1.1	−1.4 – 2.9	.1	.5
QSU Factor 2	.6	1.0	−1.3 – 2.5	.13	.5
Stressful Imagery Cue 1
QSU	.3	1.1	−1.9 – 2.6	.05	.8
QSU Factor 1	.6	1.1	−1.6 – 2.7	.09	.6
QSU Factor 2	.2	.9	−1.7 – 2.0	.03	.9
Smoking During Week Following Cue Reactivity Assessment
In Vivo Smoking Cue 1
QSU	.3	.9	−1.6 – 2.1	.05	.8
QSU Factor 1	.1	.9	−1.7 – 1.9	.02	.9
QSU Factor 2	.4	.8	−1.2 – 2.0	.1	.6
Stressful Imagery Cue 1
QSU	.2	.9	−1.6 – 2.1	.05	.8
QSU Factor 1	.01	.9	−1.8 – 1.8	.002	.9
QSU Factor 2	.1	.8	−1.4 – 1.6	.02	.9
Physiological Cue Reactivity
Smoking on Day of Cue Reactivity Assessment
In Vivo Smoking Cue 2
Heart Rate	.1	.12	−.14 – .35	.12	.4
Skin Conductance	0	.002	−.005 – .001	−.18	.2
Stressful Imagery Cue 2
Heart Rate	.2	.18	−.19 – .53	.15	.3
Skin Conductance	.0	.004	−.007 – .009	.04	.8
Smoking During Week Following Cue Reactivity Assessment
In Vivo Smoking Cue 2
Heart Rate	.03	.1	−.18 – .25	.05	.8
Skin Conductance	0	.001	−.005 – .001	−.22	.1
Stressful Imagery Cue 2
Heart Rate	.2	.16	−.08 – .56	.24	.1
Skin Conductance	0	.004	−.007 – .008	.02	.9

^aAll analyses control for presentation order of cues

¹QSU craving post active cue (smoking invivo stressful imagery) cue controlling post inactive cue (neutral invivo or relaxed imagery)

²Physiological craving, defined as percentage change from prior to cue exposure vs. peak value during cue exposure, controlling for percentage change in response to inactive cue (neutral invivo or relaxed imagery)