Skip to main content
. 2009 May;67(5):547–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03391.x

Table 5.

Classification and comparison of patients for 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk scores calculated by British National Formulary (BNF) and Framingham methods

BNF 10-year CHD risk prediction method
No. of patients in different risk categories at baseline No. of patients in different risk categories at 12 months
<15% 15–30% >30% <15% 15–30% >30%
Group (mild) (moderate) (severe) (mild) (moderate) (severe)
Intervention (n (%)) 76 (63.3%) 44 (36.7%) 0 100 (85.5%) 16 (13.7%) 1 (0.9%)
Control (n (%)) 78 (65.0%) 38 (31.7%) 4 (3.3%) 69 (59.0%) 44 (37.6%) 4 (3.4%)
P-value * 0.125 <0.001
Framingham 10-year CHD risk prediction method
No. of patients in different risk categories at baseline No. of patients in different risk categories at 12 months
<10% 10–20% >20% <10% 10–20% >20%
(mild) (moderate) (severe) (mild) (moderate) (severe)
Intervention (n (%)) 58 (48.3%) 60 (50%) 2 (1.7%) 80 (68.4%) 37 (31.6%) 0
Control (n (%)) 48 (40%) 71 (59.2%) 1 (0.8%) 43 (36.8%) 74 (63.2%) 0
P-value * 0.392 <0.001
*

When comparing control and intervention groups.