Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 28;29(4):1224–1234. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4858-08.2009

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A, B, Mean ± SE of BOLD response in caudate (A) and in middle frontal gyrus (PFC; B) during working memory in compound genotype groups. Since we expected that the genotypes potentially associated with putative intermediate levels of dopamine would show more focused activity for a similar level of behavioral performance, genotype groups are ordered from putative less dopamine reuptake (DAT 9-carriers have less DAT expression) and release (DRD2 GG subjects have greater presynaptic D2 mRNA) to greater reuptake and release (DAT 10–10 repeat DRD2 GT subjects). The relationship between compound genotype and BOLD response is nonlinear. Genotypes on the y-axis are ordered to reflect the nature of our hypothesis about the relationship between putative levels of dopamine stimulation determined by compound genotypes and BOLD activity for a given level of performance. Thus, genotypes at the two extremes of the curve are hypothesized to have intermediate levels of dopamine stimulation and more efficient BOLD activity (less activity for a given behavioral performance).