Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 17;113(21):5134–5143. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-11-190769

Table 2.

T cell subset characteristics

CD4+ T-helper cells
CD8+ cytotoxic T cells
Naive Central memory Effector memory Effector Naive Central memory Effector memory Effector
CD62L + + + +
CD45RA + + + +
Changes from night to day, % −41 −35 −32 NS −46 −30 −23 23
Correlation with cortisol −0.65* −0.62* −0.54* NS −0.68* −0.54* −0.42* NS
Changes after cortisol§, % −42 −38 −35 NS −39 −27 −21 NS
GR expression 1063 ± 31* 1098 ± 34*** 1167 ± 35 1181 ± 36 1168 ± 33 1228 ± 50* 1280 ± 51** 1367 ± 55
Correlation with epinephrine NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.26*
Changes after epinephrine§, % NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 30
Naive and central memory
Effector memory and effector
Naive and central memory
Effector memory
Effector
β-AR expression 197 ± 42* 827 ± 239 727 ± 181** 2045 ± 579 2112 ± 602

Columns show data of naive (CD45RA+CD62L+), central memory (CD45RACD62L+), effector memory (CD45RACD62L), and effector (CD45RA+CD62L) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

NS indicates not significant.

Percentage changes comparing the two extremes of the circadian rhythm during nighttime and daytime.

Correlations assessed by stepwise linear regression analyses between circadian variation in cortisol/epinephrine and respective T cell subpopulation, measured with a delay (time lag) of 3 and 0 hours with reference to cortisol and epinephrine, respectively. *P < .001.

§

Percentage change in cell numbers 180 and 30 minutes after starting cortisol and epinephrine infusions, respectively, compared with placebo numbers (Figure 4I,J); n = 10.

Morning levels of GR expression in MFI, mean ± SEM; n = 8. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, pairwise comparisons between naive versus central memory, central memory versus effector memory, and effector memory versus effector T cells, respectively.

Morning levels of β-AR expression measured by specific binding of 125I-CYP in isolated T cells; data of saturation curves (Figure 5) were analyzed using nonlinear regression plot, and the maximum number of 125I-CYP binding sites (Bmax) is presented as mean ± SEM; n = 6. *P < .05, **P < .01, pairwise comparisons between CD62L+ versus CD62L T cells and effector memory versus effector CD8+ T cells, respectively.