Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 7;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-30

Table 2.

Dimensions, detailed concepts and scoring method of the final PACT-Q

PACT-Q Dimensions Item number – Detailed concept Scoring Score range
PACT-Q1 Treatment Expectations A1 – Confidence in prevention of blood clots One score 1 to 5
A2 – Expectations of symptom relief One score 1 to 5
A3 – Expectations of side effects One score 1 to 5
A4 – Importance of ease of use One score 1 to 5
A5 – Worries about making mistakes One score 1 to 5
A6 – Importance of independency One score 1 to 5
A7 – Worries about cost One score 1 to 5
PACT-Q2 Convenience* B1 – Difficulties in taking the treatment One score 0 to 100
B2 – Bother in taking the treatment
B3 – Difficulties regarding dose adjustments required
B4 – Treatment and other medications
B5 – Treatment and regimen implications
B6 – Treatment and being away from home
B7 – Difficulties regarding daily life
B8 – Bother in follow-up required
B9 – Difficulties regarding regular intake
B10 – Feeling regarding loss of independency
B11 – Worries about having to stop the treatment
C1 – Impact of side effects on usual activities
C2 – Discomfort due to symptoms
Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction* D1 – Feeling of reassurance One score 0 to 100
D2 – Symptom decrease
D3 – Experience with side effects
D4 – Satisfaction regarding independency
D5 – Satisfaction with patient management
D6 – Satisfaction with treatment form
D7 – Overall satisfaction

* For convenience score, all items are reversed (reversed item score = 6 – initial item score), then summed and rescaled on a 0 – 100 scale; for satisfaction score, all items are summed and rescaled on a 0 – 100 scale; for both scores, the higher the score, the higher the convenience/satisfaction