Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 4;23(12):1974–1982. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.080805

Table 2.

Average Changes in Strength, Density, and Mass by Treatment Group: Year 2 Changes Compared With Baseline

Variable PTH-PLB (N = 38) PTH-ALN (N = 45) CMB-ALN (N = 39) ALN-ALN (N = 40) Between-treatment p value
Femoral strength 1.17 ± 3.53 7.74 ± 3.25 4.18 ± 3.49 4.83 ± 3.44 0.06
Trab CPMT strength 1.27 ± 2.57* 6.84 ± 2.36†‡ 2.85 ± 2.54§ 4.07 ± 2.51 <0.05
Periph CPMT strength −0.90 ± 1.83 1.65 ± 1.67 1.00 ± 1.80 1.63 ± 1.78 0.16
Geometric strength 0.45 ± 1.39* 0.47 ± 1.27* 0.70 ± 1.37* 2.76 ± 1.35 <0.05
Areal BMD (total hip, DXA) −0.17 ± 1.44* 4.79 ± 1.32 3.29 ± 1.42 3.12 ± 1.40 <0.0001
Integral density −0.79 ± 1.53* 3.11 ± 1.41 2.03 ± 1.51 1.57 ± 1.50 <0.01
Integral mass −0.87 ± 1.89* 2.72 ± 1.74 2.13 ± 1.86 2.55 ± 1.84 <0.05
Trab density −0.47 ± 1.46* 3.38 ± 1.35 2.40 ± 1.45 1.79 ± 1.43 <0.01
Trab mass −0.47 ± 1.76* 2.96 ± 1.62 2.59 ± 1.74 2.79 ± 1.72 <0.05
Cort density 0.16 ± 0.61 −0.17 ± 0.56 0.35 ± 0.60 0.33 ± 0.59 0.56
Cort mass −2.46 ± 5.47 0.78 ± 5.03 −0.66 ± 5.40 1.34 ± 5.33 0.76
Trab CPMT density 0.95 ± 2.22* 6.49 ± 2.04†‡ 4.21 ± 2.19 3.14 ± 2.16§ <0.01
Trab CPMT mass 1.04 ± 2.61* 6.00 ± 2.40 4.52 ± 2.57 4.54 ± 2.54 <0.05
Periph CPMT density −1.84 ± 1.56 0.65 ± 1.44 0.53 ± 1.55 0.67 ± 1.52 0.06
Periph CPMT mass −2.14 ± 1.92 0.42 ± 1.76 0.46 ± 1.89 1.10 ± 1.87 0.09

See Table 1 for legends.

For between-treatment effects (by ANOVA), * ≠ and §denote significant posthoc differences in changes between treatments (p < 0.05 at least).