Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Jun 22;62(9):991–998. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.04.003

Table 3.

Sibling correlations and neuropsychological performance of the groups

Effect Sizes for Group Comparisons
Significant Group Differences after covariance2
Measure Sibling Correlation1 Control M (SD) Non-ADHD cotwins of ADHD probands M (SD) ADHD Probands M (SD) Control vs. ADHD Control vs. non-ADHD cotwins Non-ADHD cotwins vs. ADHD IQ Reading Ability ADHD Symptoms
Executive Function
 Response inhibition
  CPT commissions .07/.09 9.2 (15.5) 20.3 (47.6) 27.4 (44.2) .55*** .31* .15*** C>P C>P C>S
  SSRT .30***/.47*** 285.9 (109.4) 354.5 (144.5) 380.1 (159.7) .73*** .51** .22*** C>S,P C>S,P C>S
 Vigilance
  CPT omissions .35***/.22*** 11.0 (11.6) 15.4 (16.0) 18.3 (15.7) .53*** .31** .18** None C,S>P C>S,P
 Interference Control
  Stroop .04/.19*** −.15 (.80) .03 (.90) .07 (.79) .28** .21* .05 C>P C>P C>S
 Set-shifting
  WCST3 .20**/.27*** 13.3 (9.9) 15.7 (9.3) 20.0 (17.8) .46*** .25* .30*** C,S>P C,S>P C,S>P
  Trailmaking Part B .21***/.28*** 34.1 (19.1) 41.3 (24.8) 52.6 (33.0) .69*** .33*** .39*** C,S>P C,S>P C>S>P
 Working Memory
  Digit Span .31***/.32*** 11.2 (2.9) 10.1 (2.9) 9.3 (3.0) .59*** .32*** .27** C>P C>P C>S,P
  Counting Span .26***/.36*** 7.6 (2.4) 6.6 (2.7) 6.1 (2.4) .61*** .39*** .19** C>P C>P C>S,P
  Sentence Span .23***/.39*** 5.9 (2.0) 5.1 (2.3) 4.8 (2.3) .54*** .36** .16** C>P None C>S,P
  CANTAB errors3 .29***/.39*** 32.2 (16.1) 39.7 (17.6) 44.7 (18.6) .72*** .45* .28*** C>P C,S>P C>P
  Time Estimation4,5 .48***/.42** −.20 (.58) .12 (.86) .25 (1.01) .54*** .42* .15 None None None
Processing Speed
 Coding .22***/.23*** 10.5 (2.8) 9.9 (3.0) 8.0 (3.0) .86*** .20** .63*** C,S>P C,S>P C>P
 Symbol Search3 .31***/.22*** 12.9 (3.4) 12.1 (3.3) 10.7 (3.4) .66*** .23* .43*** C,S>P C,S>P C>P
 Rapid Naming5 .36***/.20*** .06 (1.01) −.38 (1.0) −.89 (1.1) .71*** .24** .47*** C,S>P C,S>P C>S>P
 Perceptual Speed5 .38***/.29*** −.02 (1.1) −.36 (1.1) −1.1 (1.1) 1.0*** .31*** .71*** C,S>P C,S>P C>S>P
Response variability
 Go RT SD .18***/.47*** 166.0 (45.6) 196.3 (66.6) 213.9 (76.1) .76*** .53*** .25*** C>S>P C>S>P C>S,P
Motivation/Delay Aversion
 Doors Task4 .16*/.24*** 61.3 (29.1) 63.8 (29.7) 59.9 (29.5) .05 .08 .13 None None None
 Delay Aversion4 .20*/.29*** 32.7 (5.5) 32.7 (5.5) 31.7 (5.6) .17 .00 .17 None None S>P
*

indicates significance after covarying age and sex,

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p <.001.

1

Intraclass sibling correlation. Correlations in control pairs are left of the slash, and correlations between pairs with an ADHD proband are right of the slash.

2

C=control twins, S=siblings of ADHD probands without ADHD, P=ADHD probands, None indicates there were no group differences when covariate was included in the model. All scores are rescaled so that > indicates that the group(s) on the left of the symbol had better performance. 3, 4 These six tasks were added later on in the battery and have the following N’s:

3

Controls (n=236), Siblings (n=136), ADHD probands (n=156),

4

Controls (n=190), Siblings (n=92), ADHD probands (n=106).

5

Composite measures are residualized scores controlling age and sex.