TABLE 3.
Clade | Fold change in potency compared with that against adrug-sensitive straina
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3TC | TDF | EFV | NVP | MK-4965 | |
Clade A (n = 4) | 0.92 ± 0.2 | 0.95 ± 0.075 | 0.73 ± 0.35 | 0.94 ± 0.71 | 0.73 ± 0.31 |
CRF01_AE (n = 3) | 1.13 ± 0.13 | 0.78 ± 0.049 | 0.83 ± 0.10 | 0.67 ± 0.13 | 0.90 ± 0.11 |
CRF02_AG (n = 5) | 1.31 ± 0.32 | 0.93 ± 0.15 | 0.71 ± 0.13 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | 0.92 ± 0.25 |
Clade B (n = 5) | 1.06 ± 0.16 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 1.16 ± 0.63 | 1.25 ± 1.04 | 1.25 ± 0.45 |
CRF17_BF (n = 2) | 1.37 ± 0.1 | 0.83 ± 0.12 | 0.86 ± 0.09 | 0.83 ± 0.51 | 1.15 ± 0.41 |
Clade C (n = 5) | 1.07 ± 0.2 | 0.97 ± 0.19 | 0.88 ± 0.44 | 0.70 ± 0.47 | 1.07 ± 0.56 |
Clade D (n = 3) | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.09 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.01 |
Clade F1 (n = 2) | 0.87 ± 0.16 | 0.96 ± 0.09 | 0.81 ± 0.43 | 0.73 ± 0.65 | 0.72 ± 0.25 |
Clade G (n = 2) | 0.70 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.06 | 0.77 ± 0.23 | 1.25 ± 0.67 | 0.58 ± 0.13 |
Clade H (n = 2) | 0.83 ± 0.26 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 |
The drug-sensitive strain was employed as the control to determine the changes in potency.