Table 3.
Enablers to the discussion of chemoprevention in Family Cancer Centres with supporting quotes
| EVIDENCE | Participant | No | Quote |
| 'Reasonable' evidence in BRCA2 carriers | 5C (med oncologist) | 17 | I think that in a BRCA2 mutation carrier we'll discuss Tamoxifen- I'm a bit more confident about Tamoxifen with a BRCA2, than in a BRCA1. |
| Side-effects less in younger women | 1A (med oncologist) | 18 | ...side effects at that age [45] are likely be to be small in absolute terms |
| PRACTICE | |||
| Enroling people on a trial is convenient | 1B (med oncologist) | 19 | When the IBIS I study was recruiting that would be definitely part of my discussion because there was a study that they could participate in to try and get an answer. But then that closed so there's been a window between now and then [-]... There's sort of been a bit of a lull. |
| Not expensive | 5C (med oncologist) | 20 | identified that not being PBS-listed was not a constraint to prescribing Tamoxifen because it 'is not an expensive drug' |
| PERCEPTION | |||
| Action of Tamoxifen to reduce risk 'intuitively makes sense' | 5C (med oncologist) | 21 | But intuitively, I can understand how um, Tamoxifen would reduce the risk. |
| Lack of 'hard data' is not always a barrier to recommending something 5C (med oncologist) |
5A (clinical geneticist) | 22 |
5A Breast ultrasound? If you're having MRI? No, but if you aren't having it, then, there's very little hard data... 5C I know there's no hard data but that's never stopped anyone doing anything |