Table 3.

Results of the coding process in areas with gross national income per capita US$ 600-4 180.

Origin of framework	Date	Diagnosis	Exclusion criteria abcdef1	Treatability	Risk	Incapacity (admission)	Incapacity (treatment)	Review process	Autonomy rating (6–30)
		+++++		++++	+++++	+++	+++	++++
WHO	2003	+++		+	++++/++	+/+++	+++	++++	16
Council of Europe	2004	+++	a	++	++++	+	+	+++	15
Sri Lanka	1873	++		+	++	++	++	+	10
Grenada	1895	++		+	+	+	+	++	8
St Lucia	1895	++		+	+	+	+	++	8
India	1987	++++	e	+	++	+	+	++	12
Jamaica	1999	+++		+	++	+	+++	+++	13
Pakistan	2001	++++	cd	+	++	+	+++	++	15
South Africa	2002	+++++	a	+	++	+++	+++	+++	18

Number of + signs indicates the level of the framework the legislation is judged to have reached, maximum indicated at top of column.

¹a) ethnicity; religious, political, cultural or philosophical beliefs or practices, b) criminal, irresponsible or antisocial behaviour, c) sexual preference, identity or practices, d) misuse of alcohol or drugs, e) intellectual disability, f) personality disorder (may be limited to cluster B or to anti-social PD).