Skip to main content
. 2009 May;32(3):147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.02.006

Table 5.

Variation in approaches to threshold setting and compliance with standards a) over time and b) according to gross national income per capita.

Legal test Modal category6
Percentage compliance with WHO and CE standards
Modal category1
Percentage compliance with WHO and CE standards
old 80s 90s 00s Old 80s 90s 00s Low income High income Low income High income
Diagnosis Unsound mind Disability Disability Disability 0 (0/3) 100(7/7) 67(8/12) 80(8/10) Unsound mind Disability 57(4/7) 76(19/25)
++ +++ +++ +++ ++ +++
Treatability None + None + None + Effective for condition/effective for individual7 +++/++++ 100(3/3) 100 (7/7) 100(12/12) 100(10/10) None + None + 100(3/3) 100(25/25)
0 (0/3) 14 (1/7) 42 (5/12) 60 (6/10) 0 (0/3) 48 (12/25)
Risk None + Narrow safety +++++ Broad safety ++++ Broad health ++ 0 (0/3) 71 (5/7) 75 (9/12) 70 (7/10) Broad health ++ Broad safety ++++ 14 (1/7) 80 (20/25)
0 (0/3) 71 (5/7) 75 (9/12) 50 (5/10) 0 (0/7) 76 (19/25)
Incapacity (admission) None + None + None + None + 0 (0/3) 71 (5/7) 75 (9/12) 70 (7/10) None + None + 0 (0/7) 80 (20/25)
100 (3/3) 100 (7/7) 100(12/12) 100(10/10) 100 (7/7) 100(25/25)
Incapacity (treatment) None + Ability +++ None + Ability +++ 0 (0/3) 57 (4/7) 1 (1/12) 50 (5/10) None + None/Ability8 +/+++ 0 (0/7) 28 (7/25)
100 (3/3) 100 (7/7) 100(12/12) 100(10/10) 100 (7/7) 100(25/25)
Review procedure Appeal ++ Review +++ Review +++ Review +++ 0 (0/3) 0 (0/7) 0 (0/12) 0 (0/10) Appeal ++ Review +++ 0 (0/7) 0 (0/25)
0 (0/3) 71 (5/7) 75 (9/12) 80 (8/10) 29 (2/7) 80 (20/25)
6

Refer to Table 2 for the definitions of each category.

7

Bimodal distribution.

8

Bimodal distribution.