TABLE 2. Comparison of Smokers and Nonsmokers on Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations.
| Variable | Current smoker |
Nonsmoker |
d | p | Adj p | ||
| M | SD | M | SD | ||||
| Motivation | |||||||
| Fruit | 6.9 | 2.4 | 7.7 | 2.2 | 0.34 | <.001 | <.001 |
| Vegetables | 7.4 | 2.2 | 7.6 | 2.2 | 0.18 | .007 | .041 |
| Intrinsic | 5.9 | 0.9 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.27 | <.001 | <.001 |
| Extrinsic | 2.4 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.08 | .155 | .127 |
| Self-efficacy | |||||||
| Fruit | 6.9 | 2.4 | 7.6 | 2.2 | 0.30 | <.001 | <.001 |
| Vegetables | 7.2 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 0.13 | .053 | .191 |
| Expectation | |||||||
| Reduce cancer risk | 3.7 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.04 | .537 | .646 |
| Reduce heart disease risk | 3.9 | 0.9 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 0.09 | .185 | .185 |
| Reduce diabetes risk | 3.8 | 1.0 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 0.13 | .042 | .026 |
| Reduce obesity risk | 3.9 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 0.13 | .083 | .056 |
Note. Unadjusted mean values are presented with significance indicated for unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Effect size estimates (d) are based on unadjusted analyses. Adjusted analyses are controlled for site, marital status, race, education, age, BMI, vegetarian diet, low cholesterol diet, low salt diet, low carbohydrate diet, and responsibility for meal planning.