Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 15;6(2):A45.

Table 3.

Multivariate Logistic Regression of Risk and Protective Factors for Smoking Among African American 8th- and 10th-Grade Students, Virginia, 2005

Variable Model 1 (n = 784)a Model 2 (n = 674)a Model 3 (n = 663)a

OR (95% CI)b P Value OR (95% CI)b P Value OR (95% CI)b P Value
Grade
8th 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
10th 3.39 (1.89-6.09) <.001 4.04 (2.12-7.71) <.001 5.22 (1.86-14.63) .003
Mother's education
High school graduate or less 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Some college or college degree 0.38 (0.12-1.17) .09 0.31 (0.13-0.70) .006 0.29 (0.13-0.69) .006
Postgraduate education 0.24 (0.04-1.49) .12 0.24 (0.05-1.18) .08 0.23 (0.04-1.28) .09
Sex
Female 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Male 1.21 (0.35-4.24) .75 1.29 (0.34-4.93) .70 1.98 (0.44-8.86) .36
Risk and protective factors
Academic failure 3.34 (1.44-7.76) .007 3.41 (1.12-10.37) .03 2.73 (1.04-7.21) .04
Friend's use of drugs 1.88 (1.21-2.92) .007 1.45 (1.05-2.01) .03 1.28 (0.93-1.76) .12
Early initiation of alcohol and marijuanac 1.59 (1.24-2.04) .001 1.59 (1.30-1.94) <.001 1.52 (1.22-1.89) <.001
Rewards for smokingd 1.38 (0.78-2.42) .26 NI NI
Rewards for antisocial involvementd 0.52 (0.26-1.03) .06 0.71 (0.43-1.16) .16 0.81 (0.56-1.17) .26
School rewards for prosocial involvement 0.42 (0.21-0.85) .02 0.41 (0.25-0.69) .001 0.37 (0.20-0.68) .002
Parental attitudes favorable to antisocial behavior NI 1.45 (0.57-3.68) .42 1.23 (0.50-3.02) .65
Parental attitudes favorable toward alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana use NI 1.07 (0.64-1.79) .80 1.21 (0.75-1.94) .42
Family conflict NI 1.19 (0.46-3.10) .71 1.25 (0.50-3.10) .62
Family history of antisocial behavior NI 1.07 (0.73-1.57) .72 0.98 (0.64-1.50) .92
Family rewards for prosocial involvement NI 1.21 (0.46-3.18) .70 1.07 (0.40-2.92) .89
Perceived availability of drugs NI NI 1.36 (0.79-2.34) .25
Community norms NI NI 0.70 (0.38-1.29) .24
Pseudo R 2 .39 .38 .35

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NI, not included in this model.

a

Because factor constructs relied on answers to multiple survey questions, a missing response on any component resulted in a missing value for that factor scale. Information was particularly missing for items included in the family domain, which resulted in lower n's for models that included these variables. Because of this variation, the reported n's are for students with complete data on the factor or factors reported.

b

For risk and protective factors, OR indicates the increase in odds associated with a 1-point increase in factor score.

c

Factor modified to exclude cigarette smoking.

d

Rewards for antisocial behavior split to create rewards for smoking as a separate factor.