Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 15;6(2):A46.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Caregivers of People With and Without Cognitive Impairment (Weighted), North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005a

Characteristic Caregivers of People With Cognitive Impairment (n = 279) Caregivers of People Without Cognitive Impairment (n = 389) P Valueb
Age, y
18-34 19.7 (13.0-28.6) 23.5 (15.4-34.1) .13c
35-44 16.0 (11.3-22.1) 18.5 (13.9-24.2)
45-54 27.8 (21.6-34.8) 19.2 (14.8-24.5)
55-64 20.8 (15.7-27.1) 17.8 (13.6-22.8)
≥65 15.8 (11.7-21.0) 21.0 (16.5-26.4)
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 76.7 (70.1-82.2) 74.1 (64.5-81.8) .63
Non-Hispanic black 15.4 (11.1-21.0) 21.8 (14.3-31.9) .18
Other/multi-race, non-Hispanic 4.9 (2.5-9.4) 2.4 (1.1-5.2) .17
Hispanic 3.0 (1.3-6.7) 1.7 (0.6-4.4) .35
Sex, female 59.9 (51.7-67.6) 60.9 (52.2-68.9) .89
Education level
<High school diploma 6.6 (4.1-10.6) 13.9 (7.3-24.8) .18
High school diploma 29.6 (22.9-37.4) 29.0 (23.0-35.8)
>High school diploma 63.7 (56.0-70.8) 57.2 (49.0-65.0)
Annual household income, $
<25,000 30.3 (23.6-37.9) 23.3 (17.7-30.1) .10c
25,000-34,999 14.8 (9.4-22.6) 20.9 (15.3-27.9)
35,000-49,999 12.7 (8.6-18.4) 20.5 (12.8-31.1)
50,000-74,999 21.1 (15.3-28.3) 13.6 (9.8-18.6)
≥75,000 21.0 (15.0-28.6) 21.7 (16.4-28.1)
Health-related quality of life
Healthy days in the past 30, mean (95% CI) 24.3 (23.0-25.5) 23.9 (22.4,25.4) .64d
No. of days physical health not good 2.9 (2.1-3.7) 3.3 (2.4-4.3) .34d
No. of days mental health not good 3.9 (2.7-5.0) 3.7 (2.4-5.0) .81d
General health rated fair or poor 16.6 (11.9-22.5) 16.2 (12.3-21.2) .93
Rarely or never receive social or emotional support 8.7 (5.5-13.7) 6.7 (3.9-11.5) .47
Dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with life 3.7 (2.0-6.8) 2.7 (1.5-5.0) .49
Disability status
Have a disability 24.0 (18.6-30.5) 16.1 (12.4-20.8) .03
Activities limited by physical, mental, or emotional problems 23.4 (18.0-29.9) 15.1 (11.6-19.6) .02
Use special equipment 7.4 (4.5-12.0) 4.6 (2.7-7.6) .18

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

a

Data are reported as % (95% CI), except where indicated. Numbers may not total to 100% because of rounding.

b

Except where indicated, P values are reported for the difference in frequencies between caregivers of people with and without cognitive impairment, as measured by χ2 test.

c

P value reported for the difference in frequencies between caregivers of people with and without cognitive impairment, as measured by logistic regression to assess trend across ordinal variables.

d

P value reported for the difference in means between caregivers of people with and without cognitive impairment, as measured by t test.