Table 3.
Comparative GO/KEGG enrichment performance
| Species | IsoRankN | IsoRank | Græmlin1K | Græmlin2K | NB-Ma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 712/2490 | 537/1760 | 296/772 | 432/1010 | 107/261 |
| p-valueb | 1.28 e-90 | 1.31 e-68 | 5.47 e-38 | 6.87 e-54 | 2.19 e-14 |
| Human | 632/2200 | 478/1551 | 194/545 | 272/811 | 66/182 |
| Mouse | 605/2124 | 383/1371 | 191/538 | 268/794 | 65/178 |
| Fly | 574/1787 | 398/924 | 208/533 | 261/771 | 41/135 |
| Worm | 552/1698 | 376/901 | 104/257 | 140/389 | 32/124 |
| Yeast | 368/938 | 257/554 | 208/486 | 137/316 | 45/136 |
The number of GO/KEGG categories enriched by each method. Note that the boldface numbers represent the best performance w.r.t. each row.
aNetworkBLAST-M is denoted NB-M for convenience.
bAs computed by GO TermFinder. We remark that this excludes those proteins tagged IEA (inferred from electronic annotation).