Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 16;3:259–268. doi: 10.4137/bmi.s537

Table 1.

Comparison of the different physical tools to assess ovarian reserve.

Physical measurement tool Advantages Disadvantages
Ovarian volume Confirms menopausal status reliable predictor of declining OR status independent of advancing age Significant changes in ovarian volume not discernable during end of reproductive years Highly variable in younger infertile patients
Antral follicle count Consistent correlation to the age-related decline of reproductive capacity
There is no significant difference between right-sided and left-sided antral follicle counts within the same individual
The AFC is a useful prediction tool for poor IVF response or hyper IVF response
Performance for predicting failure to achieve pregnancy is poor
Highly variable in younger infertile patients AMH may be a better/equivalent predictor of age-related decline of reproductive capacity
Ovarian stromal blood flow velocity Results are highly predictive of ovarian responsiveness Results do not always correlate with advancing age