Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Apr;129(4):526–529. doi: 10.1309/W01Y0B808EMEH12L

Table 2.

Cerebrospinal Measurements and RF Analysis*

RF Analysis

Control Group (n = 95) AD Group (n = 48) PD Group (n = 40) Variable MDA
τ (pg/mL),,§ 690.2 ± 39.1 1,425.0 ± 104.3 387.8 ± 46.9 1 2.27
BDNF (pg/mL), 241.0 ± 3.7 202.3 ± 4.5 184.0 ± 5.5 2 1.94
IL-8 (pg/mL), 16.4 ± 0.9 37.4 ± 3.5 36.3 ± 4.7 3 1.92
Amyloid β42 (pg/mL),,§ 371.8 ± 20.5 268.5 ± 27.1 510.6 ± 27.8 4 1.82
β2-microglobulin (µg/mL) 1.1 ± 0.0 1.4 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.1 5 1.75
VDBP (µg/mL), 0.6 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.1 6 1.75
ApoAII (µg/mL), 1.5 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.2 7 1.62
ApoE (µg/mL), 3.9 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.1 8 1.38
Mean ± SD age (y),§ 63 ± 12 70 ± 9 59 ± 10 9 1.08
ApoAI (µg/mL) 2.6 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.3 10 0.81
Haptoglobin (µg/mL) 1.5 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.6 3.8 ± 1.1 11 0.39
No. (%) female 51 (54) 19 (40) 9 (23) 12 0.13

apo, apolipoprotein; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; IL, interleukin; MDA, mean decreased accuracy; PD, Parkinson disease; RF, random forest; VDBP, vitamin D binding protein.

*

Data are given as mean ± SEM unless otherwise indicated. If nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis test) resulted in P < .01, it was followed by Dunn corrected multiple comparisons with

P < .01 for control vs AD groups

P < .01 for control vs PD groups

§

P < .01 for AD vs PD groups. Results from RF analysis are the ranking of variables from most to least contribution to separating groups, MDA in grouping when one variable was excluded from analysis.

P < .01 by χ2 test.