Skip to main content
. 2009 Summer;8(2):140–146. doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-01-0003

Table 2.

Student performance on pre- and postlab surveys

Question category Question no. % correct prelab (n = 183) % correct postlab (n = 185) Change (post–pre) P value, multivariate hotelling T2 test P value independent t test
Rubisco: the enzyme studied in the three labs 3 37 79 42 0.000 0.000
5 28 57 29 0.000
6 30 59 29 0.000
8 44 85 41 0.000
Technique 1: SDS-PAGE 9 32 87 55 0.000 0.000
10a 68 68 0 0.363
11 28 50 22 0.000
12 31 85 54 0.000
Technique 2: Western blot 13 30 88 58 0.000 0.000
14 35 48 13 0.002
Application of techniques 1 and 2 16 26 33 7 0.032
Technique 3: tissue printing 15 36 45 9 0.011
Application of technique 3 17a 74 57 −17 0.004
18b 16 81 65 0.000
Concurrent lecture topics 2c 87 90 3 0.000 0.002
4c 54 77 23 0.000
7c 18 22 4 0.128
Previous knowledge (control) 1 94 90 −4 0.183

a Questions 10 and 17 both had correct answer in the form of ″all of the above.″ See Results for details.

b Question 18 was a follow-up question that asked for student confidence on their choice of answer on question 17. Choices included ″knew the answer,″ ″reasoned,″ ″guessed,″ and ″other.″ Both ″knew the answer″ and ″reasoned″ were counted as ″correct″ answer. See Results for details.

c Question 2 was a lecture topic covered in one-third of all nine lab sections, and question 4 was a lecture topic covered in all nine lab sections; both had separate labs related to them. Question 7 was a lecture topic without a lab activity associated with it.