Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 16;587(Pt 9):2005–2017. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.170290

Figure 9. Relationship between lamina I spinoparabrachial activity and behaviour.

Figure 9

The discharge evoked by a 10 s duration 42°C heat stimulus has been plotted against the difference in heat-evoked withdrawal latency between the ipsilateral and contralateral hindpaws. Paw withdrawal latency difference was a significant co-variant in the heat-evoked stimulus–response curves of animals with a CCI when compared to sham-operated controls (P < 0.03, ANCOVA). As withdrawal latency differences for unoperated controls were not measured they have been assigned to zero for convenience.