Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 20;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-11-8

Table 2.

Comparison between the 2D and 3D torsion curves, top values: T2D as 2D method, bottom values: T*2D as 2D method.

Average values
(3D vs. 2D) (deg)
Regression line
(3D vs. 2D)
Correlation coefficient (Difference vs. Average) Limits of agreement regression line (top) (Difference vs. Average), Limits of agreement (bottom) (Difference)
Base-apex 2.9 ± 1.9 vs. 3.4 ± 2.3 y = 0.77*x + 0.21 r = 0.67 y = 0.23*x - 0.15 ± 1.01
2.9 ± 1.9 vs. 2.9 ± 2.1 y = 0.86*x + 0.38 r = 0.39 0.03 ± 1.14

Base-mid 2.9 ± 1.9 vs. 3.7 ± 2.6 y = 0.70*x + 0.32 r = 0.71 y = 0.32*x - 0.23 ± 1.37
2.9 ± 1.9 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4 y = 0.75*x + 0.32 r = 0.56 0.51 ± 1.71

Mid-apex 2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 3.5 ± 2.4 y = 0.71*x + 0.31 r = 0.69 y = 0.30*x - 0.23 ± 1.31
2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0 y = 0.82*x + 0.81 r = 0.26 -0.39 ± 1.61