Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 2;101(11):814–827. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105

Table 2.

Characteristics of radiologists interpreting examinations included in the study

Radiologist characteristic* Total radiologists, No. Diagnostic mammograms
Without cancer, No. (%) With cancer, No. (%)
Experience
    Years of mammography interpretation
        <10 28 3715 (17.8) 187 (18.4)
        10–19 54 12 028 (57.6) 609 (59.8)
        ≥20 37 5124 (24.6) 222 (21.8)
    Percentage of time working in breast imaging
        <20 57 6308 (30.2) 278 (27.3)
        20–39 48 11 663 (55.9) 570 (56.0)
        ≥40 14 2896 (13.9) 170 (16.7)
    No. of mammograms interpreted in the previous year
        <1000 33 2246 (10.8) 114 (11.1)
        1001–2000 45 7110 (34.1) 354 (34.5)
        ≥2001 42 11 508 (55.2) 557 (54.3)
Practice characteristics
    Primary affiliation with an academic medical center
        No 115 20 215 (95.9) 998 (96.1)
        Yes 6 867 (4.1)* 41 (3.9)*
    Percentage of mammograms interpreted that were diagnostic
        0–24 62 10 619 (50.4) 505 (48.6)
        25–49 49 9084 (43.1) 481 (46.3)
        50–100 10 1379 (6.5)* 53 (5.1)*
    Performed breast biopsy examinations in the previous year
        No 35 3895 (18.9) 172 (16.9)
        Yes 83 16 727 (81.1) 847 (83.1)
*

Based on 22 121 diagnostic mammograms (21 082 without cancer and 1039 with cancer) from 32 facilities and 121 radiologists.

Number of radiologists may not add up to 121 because of radiologists missing responses to certain questions on the radiologist survey, and subsequently the number of diagnostic mammograms may be less than 22 121.