Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;20(6):1359–1367. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008080842

Table 1.

Single SNP analysis of SNP 1–8 in 704 cases and 704 controlsa

SNP Genotype OR (95% CI)b Global Pc Corrected Pd
SNP 1 GG 1.37 (0.94–2.00) 1.3 × 10−6 1.1 × 10−5
(rs943887) AG 0.88 (0.60–1.29)
AA Reference
SNP 2 TT 1.60 (1.18–2.17) 2.0 × 10−5 1.6 × 10−4
(rs943888) CT 1.17 (0.90–1.52)
CC Reference
SNP 3 GG 1.36 (0.97–1.91) 0.0014 0.0110
(rs56131962) AG 0.97 (0.70–1.36)
AA Reference
SNP 4 CC 1.37 (0.97–1.93) 0.0009 0.0069
(rs55766725) CT 0.97 (0.69–1.35)
TT Reference
SNP 5 GG 1.40 (1.00–1.96) 0.0008 0.0067
(rs1263648) AG 0.99 (0.71–1.37)
AA Reference
SNP 6 AA 1.34 (0.96–1.88) 0.0011 0.0089
(rs1263649) AG 0.95 (0.69–1.32)
GG Reference
SNP 7 GG 0.89 (0.58–1.37) 0.0096 0.0745
(rs1263650) AG 0.71 (0.46–1.10)
AA Reference
SNP 8 TT 1.02 (0.67–1.55) 0.0088 0.0680
(rs1263651) CT 0.79 (0.52–1.21)
CC Reference
a

Data for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) 1 and 2 were missing in eight individuals, and SNP 3–8 data (located in the same PCR product) were missing in three individuals in the patient group. There were no missing genotype data in the control group.

b

Odds ratio (OR) values after adjusting for age and gender by logistic regression.

c

After adjusting for age and gender by logistic regression, calculated by the likelihood ratio chi-square test (using genotype data), which compares the model with the marker and the model without the marker.

d

After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.