Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;20(6):1385–1392. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008101037

Table 2.

Intergroup comparison of key efficacy endpoints at 1 yr

ATG (n = 113) Daclizumab (n = 114) P value
BPAR 17 (15.0%) 31 (27.2%) 0.016
    Borderline changes 2 3
    Grade I 8 5
    Grade IIa 3 13
    Grade IIb 1 5
    Grade III 2 4
    Pure AMR 1 1
Steroid-resistant rejection 3 (2.7%) 17 (14.9%) 0.002
Median time to rejection (d) [interquartile range 25 to 75%] 35 [13 to 164] 13 [9 to 19] 0.007
Recurrent rejection 4 (3.6%) 7 (6.1%) 0.54
Delayed graft function 35 (31.5%) 50 (44.6%) 0.044
Graft loss 20 (17.7%) 16 (14.0%) 0.47
    From death with functioning graft 3 (2.7%) 4 (3.5%)
    From primary nonfunction 3 (2.7%) 2 (1.8%)
    From vascular thrombosis 2 (1.8%) 1 (0.9%)
    From uncontrolled rejection 3 (2.7%) 3 (2.6%)
    From hemolytic uremic syndrome 2 (1.8%) 1 (0.9%)
    From technical failure 2 (1.8%) 1 (0.9%)
    From BK virus 2 (1.8%) 0
    From other causes 3 (2.7%) 4 (3.5%)
Death 5 (4.4%) 4 (3.5%) 0.75
    From stroke 2 (1.8%) 0
    From sepsis 2 (1.8%) 1 (0.9%)
    From bleeding 0 1 (0.9%)
    From cancer 1 (0.9%) 0
    From cardiac arrest 0 1 (0.9%)
    Unknown cause 0 1 (0.9%)