Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;83(4):10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00434.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00434.x

TABLE 12.

Impact on Life Satisfaction

Direction and Significance of Impact

Study Dir. Sign.
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED
BRI Protective Service + NS
BRH Home Aide +,+ *,NS
Worcester + NS
Georgia + NS
Health Maintenance Teama +,+ NS #
Home Health Care Teama + NS
San Diego + *#
Channeling Basic +,+ NS #
Channeling Financial +,+ *,NS #
NONRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED
Highland Heights + NS
Chronic Diseaseb ? NS
Section 222 Day Carec + NS #
Section 222 Homemakerc + *#
New York City Home Care + *#
Post-Hospital Supportd NS

Note: Unless noted otherwise, impacts were assessed at the end of the first year after entry to the study. Key to symbols: “a” to “d” superscripts refer to table notes located in Appendix B. “+” indicates a more favorable outcome for the treatment group as compared to the control group. “?” indicates the direction of the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was not reported. “−” indicates a less favorable outcome for the treatment group as compared to the control group. “NS” indicates the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was not statistically significant at the 5 percent level. “*” indicates the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was statistically significant at the 5 percent level. “#” indicates the statistical significance of the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was assessed using multivariate techniques to control or adjust for baseline characteristics.