Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;83(4):10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00434.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00434.x

TABLE 9.

Impact on Survival

Direction and Significance of Impact

Study Dir.   Sign.
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED
Continuity in Carea   ∼
Continued Care   NS
BRI Protective Service   NS
BRH Home Aide   NS
Worcester +   NS
Wisconsin CCO/Milwaukeeb +   NS
Georgia +   *
Project OPENc   NS
Health Maintenance Teamd +    *#
Home Health Care Teamd   NS #
San Diegoe +   NS
Florida Pentastere,f +   *
South Carolina +   NS #
Channeling Basic +   NS #
Channeling Financial   NS #
NONRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED
Highland Heights +   *#
Chronic Disease   ∼
Section 222 Day Careg +   *#
Section 222 Homemakerg +   *#
Triageh   ∼
Chicagoi   ∼
On Loka   ∼
New York City Home Care   NS
Nursing Home without Walls Downstate +   NS #
Nursing Home without Walls Upstate +   *#
ACCESS Medicare/Private Pay   NS
ACCESS Medicare/Medicaid   *
Post-Hospital Support +   ∼

Note: Unless noted otherwise, impacts were assessed at the end of the first year after entry to the study. Key to symbols: “a” to “i” superscripts refer to table notes located in Appendix B. “−” indicates a less favorable outcome for the treatment group as compared to the control group. “+” indicates a more favorable outcome for the treatment group as compared to the control group. “∼” indicates the statistical significance of the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was not reported. “NS” indicates the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was not statistically significant at the 5 percent level. “*” indicates the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was statistically significant at the 5 percent level. “#” indicates the statistical significance of the treatment-control-group difference in outcome was assessed using multivariate techniques to control or adjust for baseline characteristics.