Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 8;276(1666):2469–2476. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0175

Table 2.

Model selection using the LRT. (Three models, used to describe the spread of PDV in the Dutch Wadden Sea, were compared to see which best fit the data. These models include: homogeneous mixing with uniform β, slight heterogeneous mixing with on the diagonal, and the full stage-structure model with the symmetrical β matrix. The likelihood ratio, degrees of freedom and p-values are listed for each pairwise model comparison. Overall, the model incorporating full stage structure and symmetrical β matrix was the best-fit model to the data.)

models being compared likelihood ratio degrees of freedom p-value better-fit model

homogeneous mixing with density dependence v. slight heterogeneous mixing with density dependence 5.38 1 0.00104 slight heterogeneous mixing with density dependence
slight heterogeneous mixing with density dependence v. strong heterogeneous mixing with density dependence 9.63 4 0.000698 strong heterogeneous mixing with density dependence