Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Sep;63(9):1005–1009. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.9.1005

Table 3.

Contribution of the Dependence Score to the Probability of Transitioning From Not Having a Home Health Aide to Having a Home Health Aide at the Subsequent Visit

Transition Probability OR (95% CI) p Value
Continuous Model
 1-point increase in total dependence score 0.04 1.45* (1.17–1.80) .001
1.48 (1.17–1.86) .001
Group Model
 Total dependence score range 0–3 0.06 N/A N/A .020
N/A N/A .026
4–6 0.17 3.09* (1.25–7.65) .015
3.26 (1.23–8.69) .018
7–10 0.25 4.96* (1.23–20.03) .025
5.19 (1.21–22.32) .027
Individual Items Model
 Element of the Dependence Scale D 0.19 3.04* (1.32–6.99) .009
3.20 (1.30–7.90) .012
E 0.24 3.02* (1.18–7.73) .021
3.09 (1.11–8.57) .030
F 0.24 4.42* (1.91–10.21) .001
4.71 (1.85–11.97) .001
*

Notes: Unadjusted model.

Adjusted model that simultaneously controlled for the following variables: age at first visit used in analyses, sex, education in years, and type of informant at previous visit (trichotomized to the following categories: spouse, child, and other).

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; N/A = not applicable.