. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2009 Jun;24(2):287–295. doi: 10.1037/a0015196

Table 4.

Affective Solidarity and Ambivalence as a Function of Tension Intensity

		Affective Solidarity						Ambivalence
		Model 1			Model 2			Model 3			Model 4
		B	SE_B	F	B	SE_B	F	B	SE_B	F	B	SE_B	F
Interpersonal tensions
	Relationship	−1.62	0.18	81.37 ^**				0.60	0.06	103.65 ^**
	Individual				−0.68	0.19	12.13 ^**				0.41	0.06	41.68 ^**
Between family variance		3.08	0.59	5.26 ^**	3.87	0.68	5.67 ^**	0.13	0.05	2.49 ^**	0.19	0.06	3.32 ^**
Parent/child variance within family		0.05	0.46	0.10	0.08	0.49	0.15	0.11	0.06	1.74	0.08	0.06	1.29
Residual variance		6.18	0.51	12.14 ^**	6.66	0.55	12.17 ^**	0.70	0.06	12.15 ^**	0.76	0.06	12.16 ^**
− 2 log likelihood		2960.60^**			3027.80^**			1637.30^**			1692.10^**

Note. Models estimated with maximum likelihood in order to compare fit of models. Covariates included generation/gender of parent, gender of child, age of child, ethnicity, education, self-rated health and social desirability. The covariance parameters are tested with Z tests and not F tests. Lower log likelihood indicates a better fit.

^**

p < .01.