Skip to main content
. 2009 May 22;10(2):684–691. doi: 10.1208/s12249-009-9256-8

Table I.

Composition and Evaluation of Fluconazole Sprays

Ingredient (% w/w) Batch code
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6
Fluconazole 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Ethyl cellulose 3 5 7.5
Eudragit® RS100 5 10 15
PEG 400 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Eutectic blend 10 10 10 10 10 10
Alcohol and acetone blend (q.s.) 100 100 100 100 100 100
Tests Average results (n = 3)
Viscosity (a ± 2.7 cPs) 15.0 26.4 43.5 7.6 20.2 51.6
Volume of solution delivered upon each actuation (b ± 0.03 ml) 0.32 0.30 0.26 0.39 0.31 0.24
Spray angle (c ± 0.4°) 78.0 79.1 81.0 76.1 78.3 82.2
Y a1 21.07 17.07 12.55 23.44 14.12 11.73
Y b2 94 115 196 120 160 210
Ex–in vivo film formation timec (d ± 35 sec) 130 160 210 110 152 230
Feeling of warmth and subsequent cooling sensationc (e ± 1 min) 12 14 15 12 14 16
Appearance of the filmc + + ++ + + ++
Dermal adhesion and flexibility of the filmc ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ +++
Water washabilityc ++ ++ ++ +++ +++ ++

a Y 1 is the amount of drug transported (μg) per ml at the end of first hour

b Y 2 is the time (min) required to transport 50% of the drug (t 50%)

cMeasured for placebo batches replacing fluconazole with blend of alcohol and acetone