Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jun;92(6):2551–2561. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1369

Table 5.

Summary of the terms for Escherichia coli clinical mastitis in the final lactation model

Confidence interval
Variable Coefficient SE Odds ratio 2.5% 97.5%
Quarter case of  E. coli clinical mastitis before the next visit
 Parity 1 (reference = parity 2 and above) −0.838 0.295 0.43 0.24 0.78
 Lactation mo 1 1.312 0.295 3.71 2.06 6.70
 Lactation mo 2 0.828 0.33 2.29 1.18 4.43
 Lactation mo 3 0.778 0.333 2.18 1.12 4.24
 Lactation mo 4 1.049 0.303 2.85 1.56 5.23
 Lactation mo 5 0.537 0.354 1.71 0.84 3.47
 Lactation mo 6 (reference = mo 7 and above) 1.122 0.294 3.07 1.70 5.53
 TEC1 2B 0.721 0.308 2.06 1.11 3.81
 TEC 2C2 0.217 0.520 1.24 0.44 3.51
 TEC 2D (reference = TEC N to 2A) 1.794 0.427 6.01 2.56 14.13
 UHS3 3 and 42 (reference = UHS 1 and 2) 0.446 0.242 1.56 0.96 2.53
1

Teat-end callosity score: N = normal teat end; 1A = thin smooth callosity ring; 1B = moderate smooth callosity ring; 1C = thick smooth callosity ring; 2A = thin rough callosity ring; 2B = moderate rough callosity ring; 2C = thick rough callosity ring; 2D = extreme rough callosity ring (severe hyperkeratosis of the teat end).

2

These covariates were nonsignificant at the 95% level but displayed a strong trend.

3

Udder hygiene score: 1 = completely free or very little dirt; 2 = slightly (2-10% of the area) covered in dirt; 3 moderately (10-30% of the area) covered in dirt; 4 = covered (>30% of the area) with caked-on dirt.