Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 8;16(6):835–843. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00021-09

TABLE 3.

Comparative sensitivities of the Pgp3 assay and commercial ELISAs

Patient group and assay No. of samples from C. trachomatis- positive patients Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) Difference in sensitivity between the Pgp3 assay and the commercial assaya (%) (95% CI) McNemar's P value
All patients
    Pgp3 356 57.9 (52.7-62.9)
    Ani Labsystems 356 49.2 (44.0-54.3) 8.7 (2.9-14.5) 0.003
    SeroCT 356 47.2 (42.1-52.4) 10.7 (4.9-16.5) <0.0005
    Medac 356 44.4 (39.3-49.6) 13.5 (7.0-20.0) <0.0005
Femalesb
    Pgp3 164 73.8 (66.5-79.9)
    Ani Labsystems 164 59.8 (52.1-67.0) 14.0 (5.5-22.5) 0.001
    SeroCT 164 55.5 (47.8-62.9) 18.3 (10.1-26.5) <0.0005
    Medac 164 45.7 (38.3-53.4) 28.0 (18.9-37.2) <0.0005
Malesb
    Pgp3 190 44.2 (37.3-51.3)
    Ani Labsystems 190 40.5 (33.8-47.6) 3.7 (−4.5-11.8) 0.42
    SeroCT 190 40.0 (33.3-47.1) 4.2 (−4.1-12.6) 0.36
    Medac 190 43.7 (36.8-50.8) 0.5 (−8.6-9.6) 1.00
a

The sensitivity of the commercial assay was subtracted from that of the Pgp3 assay.

b

P values for differences in sensitivity on male versus female sera are as follows: for the Pgp3 test, <0.0005; for the Ani Labsystems assay, <0.0005; for the SeroCT assay, 0.004; and for the Medac assay, 0.75.