Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;47(6):1657–1662. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02269-08

TABLE 2.

Sensitivities of NAATs for detection of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis with self-collected glans swab specimens from asymptomatic and symptomatic MSMa

Collection method and specimen Test Sensitivity (%)
N. gonorrhoeae
C. trachomatis
Asymptomatic MSM Symptomatic MSMb Asymptomatic MSM Symptomatic MSM
Method 1c
    Glans swab SDA 100 (7/7)d 91.8 (67/73)e 55.6 (5/9) 56.5 (13/23)f
    Glans swab AC2 100 (7/7) 95.9 (70/73) 66.7 (6/9) 56.5 (13/23)f
    FCU AC2 71.4 (5/7) 100 (73/73) 77.8 (7/9) 100 (23/23)
Method 2g
    Glans swab SDA 42.9 (3/7) 85.7 (18/21) 53.8 (7/13) 66.7 (10/15)
    Glans swab AC2 42.9 (3/7) 95.2 (20/21) 84.6 (11/13) 53.3 (8/15)
    FCU AC2 85.7 (6/7) 100 (21/21) 76.9 (10/13) 86.7 (13/15)
a

True-positive results are defined as a positive result by AC2 with FCU, positive results for glans swab specimens by both NAATs, or a positive result by a single NAAT with glans swab specimens confirmed by an alternate amplification method. Overall, the prevalence rates of C. trachomatis infection were 3.7% (22/602) for asymptomatic MSM and 13.6% (38/280) for symptomatic MSM. Overall, the prevalence rates of N. gonorrhoeae were 2.3% (14/602) for asymptomatic MSM and 33.6% (94/280) for symptomatic MSM.

b

Urethral symptoms only.

c

For specimen collection by method 1, the prevalence rates of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis among asymptomatic MSM were 2.5 (7/279) and 3.2 (9/279), respectively, and those among symptomatic MSM were 34.3 (73/213) and 10.8 (23/213), respectively.

d

The values in parentheses are the number of MSM positive/total number of MSM tested.

e

P = 0.04 by comparison with the results of AC2 with FCU.

f

P < 0.001 by comparison with the results of AC2 with FCU.

g

For specimen collection by method 2, the prevalence rates of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis among asymptomatic MSM were 2.2 (7/323) and 4.0 (13/323), respectively, and those among symptomatic MSM were 31.3 (21/67) and 22.4 (15/67), respectively.