Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 1;47(6):1620–1627. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01579-08

TABLE 2.

Correlation between the different molecular typing methods

agr type (no. of isolates) PFGE (no. of isolates) CC by BURST analysis spa CC by use of BURP algorithm (no. of isolates) No. (%) of isolates of SCCmec type:
I II IVa IVc IVd IVh
1 (20) E13 (6) CC22 Singletons (6) 6
E19 (5) CC8 CC211 (5) 4 1
A (1) CC8 CC211 (1) 1
Sporadic (8) CC067 (3) 3
CC211 (2) 1 1
Nonfounder (1) 1
Singleton (1) 1
Excluded (1) 1
2 (111) E7 (38) CC5 CC067 (35) 30 5
CC012 (1) 1
Singletons (2) 2
E8 (33) CC5 CC067 (32) 21 11
CC012 (1) 1
E10 (9) CC5 CC067 (9) 6 3
E11 (1) CC5 CC067 (1) 1
E15 (3) CC5 CC067 (3) 3
E16 (1) CC5 CC067 (1) 1
E17 (3) CC5 CC067 (1) 1
Excluded (2) 2
E18 (1) CC5 Excluded (1) 1
E20 (8) CC5 CC067 (8) 8
Sporadic (14) CC067 (12) 1 4 3 4
CC012 (1) 1
Nonfounder (1) 1
3 (4) E12 (3) CC30 CC012 (2) 2
Singleton (1) 1
Sporadic (1) Singleton (1) NDa
    Total 10 (7.4) 7 (5.2) 82 (60.8) 28 (20.7) 1 (0.8) 6 (4.4)
a

ND, not determined.