Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;47(6):1712–1717. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00001-09

TABLE 4.

Sensitivity evaluations of rTES-26, rTES-30USM, and rTES-120 IgG4 ELISAs

IgG4 ELISA type No. of samples (n = 30)
Sensitivity (%)
Positive Negative
rTES-26 24 6 80.0
rTES-30USM 28 2a 93.3
rTES-120 28 2a 93.3
a

Two serum samples that were negative by rTES-30USM were positive by rTES-120 and vice versa. Thus, the combination of rTES-30USM and rTES-120 provided 100% sensitivity.