Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 29;47(6):1927–1930. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02070-08

TABLE 1.

Agreement between results obtained by the Vitek 2 yeast susceptibility test and CLSI BMD method, with data classified by Candida speciesa

Species (nb) Antifungal agent Test system(s) % EA No. (%) of isolates with result
% CA % Error
S SDD R VME ME Minor
C. albicans (36) Fluconazole Vitek 2 17 (47.2) 8 (22.2) 11 (30.6)
Fluconazole BMD 91.6 17 (47.2) 8 (22.2) 11 (30.6) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Voriconazole Vitek 2 27 (75) 4 (11.1) 5 (13.9)
Voriconazole BMD 94.4 27 (75) 3 (8.3) 6 (16.7) 97.2 0.0 0.0 2.8
C. glabrata (84)c Fluconazole Vitek 2 23 (27.4) 15 (17.8) 46 (54.8)
Fluconazole BMD 100 24 (28.6) 12 (14.3) 48 (57.1) 96.4 0.0 0.0 3.6
Voriconazole Vitek 2 42 (50.0) 13 (15.5) 29 (34.5)
Voriconazole BMD 100 41 (48.8) 13 (15.5) 30 (35.7) 97.6 0.0 0.0 2.4
a

Abbreviations: EA, essential agreement; S, susceptible; SDD, susceptible, dose dependent; R, resistant; CA, categorical agreement; VME, very major error; ME, major error; minor, minor error.

b

n, no. of isolates tested.

c

Of all isolates tested (n = 86), two isolates had MICs not determinable with Vitek 2.