Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 8;47(6):1871–1877. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00120-09

TABLE 3.

Comparison of results of mPCR/RLB and comparator methods in detection of genital infection/colonization with 14 recognized or putative genital pathogens

Organism Limit of detectiona (ng/μl) No. positively detected by mPCR/RLBb Comparator methodc (target) No. positively detected by comparator method
T. vaginalis 1.5 × 10−9 1 sPCR (18S rRNA gene) 1
S. pneumoniae 7.4 × 10−1 1 Culture 1
N. gonorrhoeae 4.3 × 10−2 7 Culture and Amplicor PCR 2 (+5)d
C. trachomatis 7.0 × 10−11 55 Amplicor PCR 50 (+5)d
Ureaplasma spp.e 7.8 × 10−9 84 Culture 86
G. vaginalis 7.8 × 10−3 3 sPCR (16-23S rRNA gene) 3
H. influenzae 7.0 × 10−8 31 Culture 35
HSV1 4.3 × 10−8 8 sPCR (pol) 5
N. meningitides 8.2 × 10−8 2 Culture 1
M. hominis 5.5 × 10−1 15 Culture 16
M. genitalium 2.1 × 10−9 15 sPCR (16S rRNA gene) 15
Adenovirus 6.3 × 10−7 4 sPCR (hexon gene) 4
a

For mPCR/RLB.

b

sPCR, using the same primers as those for mPCR, was performed on specimens with discrepant mPCR/RLB and culture results. In all cases the mPCR/RLB and sPCR results were concordant.

c

Comparator methods were either the culture of urethral swab collected at the same time as first-voided urine specimen or sPCR on the same urine DNA extract as that used for mPCR/RLB, using a different, species-specific target (except for adenoviruses, for which the same hexon gene target was used).

d

Of the 7 and 55 specimens positive by mPCR/RLB for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis, respectively, only 2 and 50 were positive initially in the Roche Amplicor PCR; all were positive on retesting.

e

Urethral specimens were cultured for ureaplasmas, but isolates were not speciated. Ureaplasma spp. identified in the mPCR/RLB-positive specimens are shown in Fig. 2.