Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):969–e1. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318198683a

Table 4.

Logistic regression models for the association of ICH and TV (both measured and calculated) cutoffs with poor outcome and mortality

Poor Outcome Model
Mortality Model
ICH >25 mL TV >40 mL
LRT Comparing ICH and TV (M/C) p (M/C) ICH >30 mL TV >60 mL (M/C)
LRT Comparing ICH and TV (M/C) p (M/C)
M C M C
2-log likelihood 168.8 130.0 139.3 38.8/29.5 <0.001 204.6 184.0 187.4 20.6/17.2 <0.001
OR 5.2 41.6 31.9 4.3 8.9 8.1
95% CI for OR 2.3–11.6 9.6–180.6 7.4–138 2.2–8.5 4.3–18.1 4–16.5
p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

M, measured TV (intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH] volume + measured intraventricular extension of ICH [IVH] volume); C, calculated TV (ICH volume + calculated IVH volume using eIVHS/5); LRT, likelihood ratio test; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Logistic regression of individual volume cutoffs to poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4–6) and mortality.