Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Oct 31;33(1):169–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00825.x

Table 2.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Associations Between Type of Alcohol Outlet Density and Intimate Partner Violence for a One-Unit Increase in Alcohol Outlet Density

Unadjusted
Adjusted
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Male-to-female partner violencea
 Total alcohol outlet density 1.015 (0.999, 1.031) 0.06 1.030 (1.009, 1.052) 0.01
 On-premise alcohol outlet density 1.014 (0.997, 1.031) 0.11 1.030 (1.009, 1.052) 0.01
 Off-premise alcohol outlet density 0.994 (0.935, 1.056) 0.84 1.023 (0.941, 1.113) 0.59
Female-to-male partner violencea,b
 Total alcohol outlet density 0.994 (0.972, 1.015) 0.56 1.011 (0.991, 1.039) 0.48
 On-premise alcohol outlet density 0.992 (0.969, 1.016) 0.51 1.010 (0.981, 1.042) 0.57
 Off-premise alcohol outlet density 1.010 (0.954, 1.069) 0.73 1.054 (0.988, 1.127) 0.11

Note: OR and 95% CI refers to odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for male and female age, education level, employment status, and illicit drug use; couple level race ethnicity, income, and marital status; and zip code level percent living in poverty and percent living in owner occupied homes.

b

Also adjusted for zip code level percent with a high school degree and percent with a college education.