Table 2.
Unadjusted and Adjusted Associations Between Type of Alcohol Outlet Density and Intimate Partner Violence for a One-Unit Increase in Alcohol Outlet Density
Unadjusted |
Adjusted |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
Male-to-female partner violencea | ||||||
Total alcohol outlet density | 1.015 | (0.999, 1.031) | 0.06 | 1.030 | (1.009, 1.052) | 0.01 |
On-premise alcohol outlet density | 1.014 | (0.997, 1.031) | 0.11 | 1.030 | (1.009, 1.052) | 0.01 |
Off-premise alcohol outlet density | 0.994 | (0.935, 1.056) | 0.84 | 1.023 | (0.941, 1.113) | 0.59 |
Female-to-male partner violencea,b | ||||||
Total alcohol outlet density | 0.994 | (0.972, 1.015) | 0.56 | 1.011 | (0.991, 1.039) | 0.48 |
On-premise alcohol outlet density | 0.992 | (0.969, 1.016) | 0.51 | 1.010 | (0.981, 1.042) | 0.57 |
Off-premise alcohol outlet density | 1.010 | (0.954, 1.069) | 0.73 | 1.054 | (0.988, 1.127) | 0.11 |
Note: OR and 95% CI refers to odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.
Adjusted for male and female age, education level, employment status, and illicit drug use; couple level race ethnicity, income, and marital status; and zip code level percent living in poverty and percent living in owner occupied homes.
Also adjusted for zip code level percent with a high school degree and percent with a college education.